- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:07:12 -0600
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 15:29 -0700, Larry Masinter wrote: > (resent to public tag) with regard to ACTION-283 / ISSUE-41 > > In the meanwhile, here is the Editor’s Draft > > http://larry.masinter.net/tag-versioning.html I'm having a hard time getting engaged in this document; it uses an editorial style that I find off-putting; it starts with "This document...", which is too self-conscious for my tastes. It also presents a list of terms and definitions without motivating the complexity. At the risk of beating a dead horse, if we're to work on versioning, I strongly suggest we approach it as a collection of patterns, i.e. known problems and solutions e.g. - when HTML was started, we didn't know which tags we'd ultimately need - therefore: ignore unknown tags - but: it doesn't always work; see forms, tables (perhaps another pattern is the <noscript> alternative pattern) - likewise in HTTP - but there the solution is to ignore not just the header name but the content of the header too - the XSLT versioning strategy - the COM uuid strategy (mostly for contrast with web techniques) oops... time for the telcon... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 18:07:21 UTC