- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:19:59 -0500
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Jonathan Rees writes: > A deadline later than Dec 1 for either metadata OR HTTP > semantics would help me out quite a bit. I suppose the two are related to a point, but given that we've identified metadata as a big theme for the TAG, my leaning would be to suggest delaying HTTP semantics as necessary to get preparation on metadata going into the F2F. Thank you. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org 11/13/2009 10:29 AM To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: Re: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62 Yes, I have this as an action (ACTION-282, due date now put at Dec 1). I am still hoping to make a start on this but some help would be welcome - it turns out Dec 1 is simultaneously a deadline for this, for HTTP semantics, and for reports on two of my non-W3C projects, so I'm going to be overwhelmed between now and then. A deadline later than Dec 1 for either metadata OR HTTP semantics would help me out quite a bit. Jonathan On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:43 PM, ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > Issue 62 is about Uniform Access to Metadata. > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/62 > My take on the landscape is that we now have several mechanisms for access > to Metadata > (Link Header, Link, Site-Meta, RDFa) which we are reasonably satisfied with > and what we need is > a document that ties them all together and explains what should be used in > what situations with examples, etc. > > Jonathan had taken an action to start work on such a document. See > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/282 > If we could have a draft to discuss at the f2f, that would be wonderful. > > As I told some of you, I ran into Mark Nottingham at the TPAC and we talked > about a document > to tie the threads of Metadata access together. Mark said he was interested > in writing such a document but > was constrained by time availability etc. I have not followed up with Mark > because, I think, the TAG should > first decide what we want to do in the area. > -- > All the best, Ashok > >
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 16:20:34 UTC