- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:15:28 -0600
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>, Thinh Nguyen <thinh@creativecommons.org>, www-tag@w3.org, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
I know this thread has gone quiet, but that's not because we don't think it's important. I took the ball on this in the 22 Oct TAG teleconference. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/10/22-minutes.html#item06 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/322 I'm working with Rigo and others to find people qualified to research the legal as well as technical aspects. A somewhat arbitrary estimate on when I'll have news is end of January. On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 14:59 -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > I think there are architectural as well as legal issues involved here, > though I'll admit that the border between the strictly technical > architectural issues, and the social architectural issues, isn't always > crisp. [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 21:15:39 UTC