- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:05:25 +0100
- To: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Original Message From: "Rick Jelliffe" To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>; <www-tag@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 4:25 PM Subject: Comment on XSD 1.1 > In concrete terms, I propose this: > > 1) A radically simpler schema language, compatible as much as a possible > with the current XSD 1.0 syntax, be created. It should have the following > properties: > > ... > v) It should have no constraints or requirements for streamable > implementation > > 2) A secondary layer which adds: > ... > iii) Features problematic for databinding and to allow streaming > validation would be allowed I'm not sure how a base layer that is not streamable can have a layer added to it that makes it streamable. Am I missing something? And my two cents on other issues... - Restricting the range of integers and length/patterns of strings seems useful for the base layer. - I don't think arbitrary values for minOccurs/maxOccurs (as opposed is ?, , *, and +) are a problem. Which really points to different people wanting different things so sub-setting XSD into layers is going to be a problem. It's probably best to start afresh. I that respects I agree with Michael's sentiments of letting XSD 1.1 go forwards and then working on something new. Thanks, Pete Cordell Codalogic Ltd Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++ data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes. Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ for more info
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 19:06:12 UTC