Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 7 May 2009

Well, if someone wants to make a proposal in email, I'm all for it.  I 
think what we need is:

* A specific proposal for what, if anything, to do about publishing new 
drafts, notes, etc. (presumably chosing one of your 3 options)
* A suggestion for what if anything we will do to follow up in terms of 
technical analysis, who will do it, etc.

If we can get that without discussion, that's fine with me. 

Noah

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
05/05/2009 08:46 PM
 
        To:     noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
        cc:     www-tag@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 7 May 2009


On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 18:54 -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
[...]
>     4. nameSpaceState-48 ([16]ISSUE-48) (Brief):

I don't think this merits teleconference time. I suggest
you take it out.

>           + Background:
>                o Dan [17]alerts us (member only) that working draft
>                  [18]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-200603
>                  29/ is way overdue for update
>                o [19]Reply from Norm Walsh (member only)
>           + Goals:
>                o Decide whether to:
>                    1. do nothing; it'll default to "WD no longer in
>                       development" and probably not be easy to find
>                    2. re-publish as Note
>                    3. re-publish as WD (incorporating comments, though
>                       it's not apparent we've received any)
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 01:12:37 UTC