www-tag@w3.org from May 2009 by date

Friday, 29 May 2009

• Re: What would count as an unbiased survey? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: What would count as an unbiased survey? Norman Walsh
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues Michael Champion
• Re: What would count as an unbiased survey? Robin Berjon
• Re: What would count as an unbiased survey? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: What would count as an unbiased survey? Robin Berjon
• What would count as an unbiased survey? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues Henry S. Thompson
• Minutes of TAG telcon 2009-05-28 Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues Rick Jelliffe

Thursday, 28 May 2009

• Re: Web app security - Caja demo Dan Connolly
• Re: Web app security - Caja demo Jonathan Rees
• stability of content type sniffing algorithm? contentTypeOverride-24 / issue-24 Dan Connolly
• Re: Web app security - Caja demo Dan Connolly
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 27 May 2009

• Web app security - Caja demo Jonathan Rees
• Agenda for TAG teleconference of 28 May 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 26 May 2009

• [ISSUE-34] TAG work on XML Functions noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Draft minutes of TAG teleconference of 21 May 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Saturday, 23 May 2009

• RE: Versioning and HTML noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Versioning and HTML -- version indicators noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Versioning and HTML -- version indicators noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 25 May 2009

• RE: Comment on XSD 1.1 Michael Kay
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Anne van Kesteren
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Julian Reschke
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues Rick Jelliffe

Friday, 22 May 2009

• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics Norman Walsh
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Mukul Gandhi
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Julian Reschke
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Pete Cordell
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Felix Sasaki
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Martin J. Dürst
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Rick Jelliffe
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Mukul Gandhi
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) rjelliffe@allette.com.au

Thursday, 21 May 2009

• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Dan Connolly
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Dan Connolly
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Julian Reschke
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Anne van Kesteren
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases John Kemp
• Re: a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Julian Reschke
• a few URI/href issues captured with test cases Dan Connolly
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) John Kemp
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Rick Jelliffe
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Mukul Gandhi
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Rick Jelliffe
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Mukul Gandhi
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Mukul Gandhi
• Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues Rick Jelliffe

Wednesday, 20 May 2009

• RE: Comment on XSD 1.1 Michael Kay
• Next steps on TAG ISSUE-60 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) David Ezell
• TAG discussion schedule for concerns about XSD 1.1 (Re: Comment on XSD 1.1) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics Norman Walsh
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Mukul Gandhi
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• RE: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Mukul Gandhi
• RE: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Mukul Gandhi
• RE: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Michael Kay
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Agenda for 21 May 2009 TAG Teleconference and Start of F2F Agenda Planning noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 19 May 2009

• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Dan Brickley
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) T.V Raman
• RE: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Henri Sivonen
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Larry Masinter
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 18 May 2009

• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) ashok malhotra
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) T.V Raman
• RE: Versioning and HTML -- version indicators David Booth
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Shane McCarron
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Julian Reschke
• XML Schema usage statistics (WAS: Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly) Paul Cotton

Saturday, 16 May 2009

• Draft minutes of 2009-05-12 TAG weekly Jonathan Rees
• RE: Versioning and HTML -- version indicators Marc de Graauw

Friday, 15 May 2009

• RE: Versioning and HTML -- version indicators noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Minutes of the 7th May TAG teleconference John Kemp
• Re: more struggles with POWDER test materials Smith, Kevin, (R&D) VF-Group
• Re: more struggles with POWDER test materials Cameron McCormack
• Re: more struggles with POWDER test materials Smith, Kevin, (R&D) VF-Group
• Re: more struggles with POWDER test materials Cameron McCormack

Thursday, 14 May 2009

• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Pete Cordell

Wednesday, 13 May 2009

• RE: Comment on XSD 1.1 Michael Kay
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Pete Cordell
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 14 May 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Comment on XSD 1.1 Michael Kay
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Comment on XSD 1.1 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Comment on XSD 1.1 Dave Peterson
• RE: Comment on XSD 1.1 Michael Kay
• Comment on XSD 1.1 Rick Jelliffe
• Re: more struggles with POWDER test matierals Phil Archer
• Re: more struggles with POWDER test matierals Harry Halpin
• Re: more struggles with POWDER test matierals Phil Archer

Tuesday, 12 May 2009

• Sam Ruby blog posting on microformats, RDFa, HTML5 , etc. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• [ISSUE-34] Status check: progress on TAG issue xmlFunctions-34 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 7 May 2009

• [ISSUE-61] The TAG encourages discussion of the "Usage Patterns For Client-Side URI parameters" working draft noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: update ISSUE-41 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 6 May 2009

• Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 7 May 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 7 May 2009 Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 5 May 2009

• Agenda for TAG teleconference of 7 May 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Geolocation and privacy ashok malhotra
• Re: Geolocation and privacy noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Draft minutes of TAG teleconference of 23 April 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• more struggles with POWDER test matierals Dan Connolly

Monday, 4 May 2009

• RE: A new RFC for Web Addresses/Hypertext References: Background wrt LEIRIs Larry Masinter
• Re: A new RFC for Web Addresses/Hypertext References: Background wrt LEIRIs ( ISSUE-27 ) Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 1 May 2009

• Versioning and HTML -- recap Larry Masinter
• Re: A new RFC for Web Addresses/Hypertext References: Background wrt LEIRIs ( ISSUE-27 ) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: A new RFC for Web Addresses/Hypertext References: Background wrt LEIRIs Giovanni Campagna
• Re: A new RFC for Web Addresses/Hypertext References: Background wrt LEIRIs Martin J. Dürst
• Re: A new RFC for Web Addresses/Hypertext References: Background wrt LEIRIs Martin J. Dürst

Last message date: Friday, 29 May 2009 16:42:25 UTC