- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:17:37 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
The agenda for the TAG teleconference of 2 April 2009 is available at
[1,2], and is copied in text form below. The version circulated earlier
this afternoon retained an erroneous reference to the draft finding for
ISSUE-60. That is corrected here.
Noah
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/04/02-agenda
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
[1]W3C | [2]TAG | Previous: (Telcon) Prev: [3]26th March Next: 9
April 2009
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/26-agenda
Agenda of 02 April 2009 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details - [5]issues list and [6]Issue
Tracker ([7]handling new issues) - [8]www-tag archive - [9]tag
archive
1. Convene
+ Chair: Noah, Scribe: Larry (unconfirmed)
+ Roll call -- Regrets: none
+ Note future regrets: Raman (April 9, 16, 23) Henry (April
9) Tim (April 23rd)
+ Agenda Review - [10]this agenda
+ Next Telcon: Propose 9 April 2009; Chair: Noah; Scribe:
Jonathan
+ Future scribes: Jonathan > Dan > Ashok > Larry
2. Approval of Minutes from previous telcons and meetings
+ [11]Face to face meeting 3-5 March 2009
o Henry [12]warns (member-only) of a questionable edit
in transcript for 4 March
o Possible error in table of contents for Wed. 4 March
2009
+ [13]26th March 2009 Henry promises these for afternoon of
the 31st -- URI will be updated as necessary.
3. Administrative items (Brief)
+ Reminder that chair has sent a [14]summary of materials
relating to TAG priorities and a [15]request that the next
round of discussions of goals and priorities be done using
email, starting now.
4. Planning TAG Autumn F2F
+ Background:
o TAG has tentatively agreed to meet half-days on Monday
and Friday of Santa Clara TPAC in November if W3C
decides to hold that meeting.
o Sentiment on 26 March call was that we need a more
proper 2-3 day Autumn meeting in addition to TPAC.
o Some members have requested we decide soon.
o Chair suggests late Sept or October, Silicon Valley
— host TBD (on the theory that the June meeting is
East Coast)
5. webApplicationState-60 ([16]ISSUE-60): Web Application State
Management
+ Background:
o [17]Request from T.V. Raman that we publish this as a
W3C Working Draft.
o Raman then prepared the following for consideration as
content of the working draft: [18]State in Web
application design (Version: 19 April 2006)
o Henry promises draft formatted per pubrules in time
for the call
+ Goals:
o Decide to publish a W3C working draft.
6. UniformAccessToMetadata-62 ([19]ISSUE-62): Metadata
+ Discussion will be led by: Jonathan Rees (unconfirmed)
+ Background:
o Pursuant to [20]ACTION-227, Jonathan Rees prepared
[21]a survey of issues relating to metadata.
o See email thread starting with [22]Jonathan's
announcement of the survey document.
+ Goals:
o Review Jonathan's draft.
o Decide what, if anything, the TAG should do in the
area of metadata.
7. CURIEs in RDFa, @rel, and the HTML profile attribute
+ Discussion will be led by: John Kemp (unconfirmed)
+ Background:
o The TAG been [23]asked to help resolve concerns with
the use of CURIEs in RDFa and with the HTML profile
attribute.
o See also the very long email thread that began with an
[24]email message from Mark Nottingham to www-tag
titled "Using XMLNS in link/@rel", which in turn led
to a message to the public-html list from Julian
Reschke titled [25]@rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to
ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel.
The long thread starts with that; early messages in
the thread were not cross-posted to www-tag, but later
ones were (starting with [26]this one).
o [27]ACTION-240 on John Kemp: read thread on RDFa,
CURIEs and profile and summarize
[28]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Fe
b/0295.html -- due 2009-03-21 -- OPEN.
+ Goals:
o Review www-tag discussion of this issue
o Decide what steps, if any, the TAG wants to take to
help the community resolve these concerns.
8. contentTypeOverride-24 ([29]ISSUE-24):
+ Discussion will be led by: Dan Connolly (confirmed)
+ Background:
o Dan Connolly [30]suggests that we discuss the draft
[31]Content-Type Processing Model, by Ian Hickson and
Adam Barth; the draft proposes interoperable rules for
Content-type "sniffing" in browsers. Note that the
draft acknowledges at one point that it is in "...
willful violation of the HTTP specification.
[32]RFC2616]".
o [33]ACTION-233 on Larry Masinter: Report back from
IETF/HTML liaison meeting in March regarding MIME type
override - due 2009-03-11 - open
o [34]ACTION-236 on Noah Mendelsohn: Schedule discussion
of the stress on media types imposed by client-side
synthesised[sic] content - due 2009-04-09 - open
+ Goals:
o Update TAG on IETF liaison wrt the Content-Type
Processing Model draft.
o Solicit TAG reviews.
9. HTML
+ Background:
o Discussion on 26 March telcon of HTML progress at W3C
Advisory Committee meeting. link to be supplied when
minutes are available
o Dan Connolly and Michael Sperberg-McQueen draft
[35]Web addresses in HTML 5, which is factored from
the HTML 5 draft. (see [36]email from Dan announcing
the draft).
o [37]ACTION-253 on Dan Connolly: Brief the TAG on
progress on \"web addresses in HTML\" draft - due
2009-04-01 - open ([38]ISSUE-27)
o This seems also to relate to [39]ACTION-188 on Dan
Connolly: Investigate the URL/IRI/Larry Masinter
possible resolution of the URL/HTML5 issue. - due
2009-03-17 - closed.
+ Goals:
o Discuss [40]Web addresses in HTML 5.
10. XMLVersioning-41 ([41]ISSUE-41).
+ Background:
o The TAG had earlier decided not to actively pursue
development of the finding on versioning.
o HTML working group action 108 [42]requests that the
TAG consider HTML when working on versioning
o Thread starting with [43]John Kemp email on updating
AWWW good practice note on versioning
o At 23 March 2009 AC meeting there was at least an
informal sense that the AC wanted the TAG to help with
the extensibility issue, primarily in the context of
HTML. Tim took an action (from the AC, not the TAG) to
see that the TAG takes a look at this.
o [44]Chair's message summarizing status of Versioning
work at the TAG (sent 24 March 2009) includes the
following:
# The drafts that Dave Orchard spent several years
helping us to write will be published as W3C
notes, with an effort made to incorporate the
formalism
# Larry is going to drive a review on how the TAG
might be helpful to the HTML community with
respect to extensibility and versioning
# John and Noah will explore revisions to the AWWW,
which currently [45]advises "A data format
specification SHOULD provide for version
information." Noah wrote a [46]TAG blog entry
awhile ago questioning the wisdom of that advice.
# Many TAG members seem to feel that Jonathan's
work on formalism is promising, but except for
encouraging Dave Orchard to include it in the
W3C, we at this time have no formal activity
scheduled to follow up on the formalism.
o The following TAG actions are open or pending under
ISSUE-41:
# [47]ACTION-183 (David Orchard) Incorporate
formalism into versioning compatibility
strategies. Due 3 March 2009. Pending review
Jonathan reports that he and David have decided
not to incorporate the formalism after all, so we
need to consider fate of the formalism work.
# [48]ACTION-229 (Noah Mendelsohn) Noah to respond
to John Kemp proposal of Feb 17 on versioning.
Due 14 April 2009. Pending review
# [49]ACTION-241 (Larry Masinter) Larry Masinter to
Review TAG versioning situation and report back
to TAG and HTML - due 2009-03-12, open
+ Goals:
o Decide whether, given the above background, we want to
again work actively on versioning, and if so, with
what specific goals.
o Review status of TAG actions. At very least, establish
follow up on thread started with John Kemp's 17 Feb.
message, and then close [50]ACTION-229.
11. Pending Review Items:
+ [51]Pending review actions in [52]Tracker
12. Overdue Action Items:
+ [53]Overdue actions in [54]Tracker
13. Any other business
_________________________________________________________
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#telcon
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues
[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/04/02-agenda
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/03-agenda
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Mar/0123.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/26-minutes
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Mar/0138.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Mar/0139.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Mar/0023.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/state-20060419
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/227
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/02/metadata-survey.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0221.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0295.html
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0270.html
[25]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Feb/0753.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0279.html
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/240
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0295.html
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/24
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0233.html
[31] http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-abarth-mime-sniff/
[32] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/233
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/236
[35]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/att-0444/draft.html
[36]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/0444.html
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/253
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/27
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/188
[40]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/att-0444/draft.html
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/41
[42] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/108
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0147.html
[44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Mar/0146.html
[45] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#versioning
[46] http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/12/version_identifiers_reconsider.html
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/183
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/229
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/241
[50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/229
[51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
Noah Mendelsohn for TAG
$Revision: 1.21 $ of $Date: 2009/03/31 20:33:39 $
[55]Valid XHTML 1.1
[55] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:19:03 UTC