- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:57:53 -0700
- To: Technical Architecture Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>
- CC: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
I'm in the IETF apparea meeting, enjoying these presentations
on BOSH, Bayeaux, WebSock, rHTTP,
10:00 Bidirectional HTTP: BOSH, Bayeux, COMET, WebSockets, rHTTP
Peter Saint-André, Salvatore Loreto, Greg Wilkins,
and/or Mark Lentczner?
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html
http://svn.cometd.org/trunk/bayeux/bayeux.html
draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-02.txt
draft-lentczner-rhttp-00
http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/74/apparea.html
I can't seem to find a pointer to this nice summary by Mark L.
mnot brought up BCP56...
peter@jabber.org: "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate"
peter@jabber.org: http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp56
-- http://jabber.ietf.org/logs/apparea/2009-03-23.txt
which reminds me of TAG ISSUE-16 HTTPSubstrate-16, which
we recently estimated is all over but the crying, i.e. PENDINGREVIEW
Should HTTP be used as a substrate protocol? Does W3C agree with RFC
3205?
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/16
people are talking about a new mailing list... BOF deadlines... etc.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 17:58:04 UTC