- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:15:35 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, plh@w3.org
At the request of several TAG members, I have added discussion of XHTML
futures to the agenda for tomorrow's TAG call, and I have invited Philippe
le Hegaret to join us for that discussion. The updated agenda is at
[1,2], and a text copy is attached.
Noah
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/12-agenda
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
[1]W3C | [2]TAG | Previous: (Telcon) Prev: [3]3-5th March Next: 19
March 2009
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/03-agenda
Agenda of 12 March 2009 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details - [5]issues list and [6]Issue
Tracker ([7]handling new issues) - [8]www-tag archive - [9]tag
archive
1. Convene
+ Chair: Noah, Scribe: John (unconfirmed)
+ Roll call -- Regrets: Ashok, Tim.
+ Note future regrets: John (19 March), Jonathan (19 March),
Tim (19 March), Larry (26 March)
+ Agenda Review - [10]this agenda
o Pending Action Items: Chair proposes that TAG give him
permission to close this week's PENDING REVIEW issues
at his discretion. See [11]email from Noah.
+ Next Telcon: Propose 19th March 2009; Chair: Noah; Scribe:
Larry
+ Future scribes: Henry > Jonathan > Dan
2. Administrative items (Brief)
+ Status check on F2F minutes
+ Chair update on group priorities and issue tracking
+ [12]WBS Survey on proposed 2-6 November 2009 W3C Technical
Plenary (TPAC) (W3C member only) to be held in Santa Clara,
CA.
o Recent tradition is that those TAG members who are at
TPAC anyway meet for a half day Monday, and a half day
Friday, and we also attempt to make ourselves
available to other working groups on a best effort
basis during the week. Typically we do not have a
quorum and thus don't make binding decisions. Do we
want to continue the tradition at the November 2009
TPAC? Would anyone prefer attempting a more formal TAG
meeting at TPAC?
o Survey response is due from the chair by 18 March
2009. We should indicate whether we expect to attend,
likely number of attendees, etc.
3. XHTML
+ Background:
o [13]Proposals from W3C team (W3C member-only — see
subsection labeled 'Relation of HTML to XHTML2 and
XForms')
o [14]Request from Larry and [15]request from T.V.
Raman(member-only) that we schedule this discussion
soon.
o Philippe le Hegaret has been invited to join us for
this session.
+ Goals:
o Learn more about W3C staff ideas regarding the future
of XHTML. Our hope is that this will inform ongoing
efforts by the TAG to help with the development and
positioning of HTML5- and XHTML-related technologies.
4. Metadata
+ Background:
o Pursuant to [16]ACTION-227, Jonathan Rees prepared
[17]a survey of issues relating to metadata.
o See email thread starting with [18]Jonathan's
announcement of the survey document.
+ Goals:
o [19]ACTION-227 should be closed.
o Review Jonathan's draft.
o Decide what, if anything, the TAG should do in the
area of metadata.
5. CURIEs in RDFa, @rel, and the HTML profile attribute
+ Background:
o The TAG has, within the last week, been [20]asked to
help resolve concerns with the use of CURIEs in RDFa
and with the HTML profile attribute.
o See also athe very long email thread that began with
an [21]email message from Mark Nottingham to www-tag
titled "Using XMLNS in link/@rel", which in turn led
to a message to the public-html list from Julian
Reschke titled [22]@rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to
ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel.
The long thread starts with that; early messages in
the thread were not cross-posted to www-tag, but later
ones were (starting with [23]this one).
+ Goals:
o Review www-tag discussion of this issue
o Decide what steps, if any, the TAG wants to take to
help the community resolve these concerns.
6. contentTypeOverride-24 ([24]ISSUE-24):
+ Background:
o Dan Connolly [25]suggests that we discuss the draft
[26]Content-Type Processing Model, by Ian Hickson and
Adam Barth; the draft proposes interoperable rules for
Content-type "sniffing" in browsers. Note that the
draft acknowledges at one point that it is in "...
willful violation of the HTTP specification.
[27]RFC2616]".
+ Goals:
o Decide whether TAG wants to respond to the
Content-Type Processing Model draft.
7. XMLVersioning-41 ([28]ISSUE-41).
+ Background:
o The TAG had earlier decided not to actively pursue
development of the finding on versioning.
o HTML working group action 108 [29]requests that the
TAG consider HTML when working on versioning
o See thread starting with [30]John Kemp email on
updating AWWW good practice note on versioning
o The following actions are open under ISSUE-41, but the
chair proposes not to discuss them in detail on this
call:
# [31]ACTION-183 (David Orchard) Incorporate
formalism into versioning compatibility
strategies. Due 3 March 2009.
# [32]ACTION-229 (Noah Mendelsohn) Noah to respond
to John Kemp proposal of Feb 17 on versioning.
Due 13 March 2009.
+ Goals:
o Decide whether, given the background referenced above,
we want to again work actively on versioning, and if
so, with what specific goals.
8. Overdue Action Items:
+ [33]Overdue actions in [34]Tracker
9. Any other business
_________________________________________________________
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#telcon
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues
[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/12-agenda
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Mar/0112.html
[12] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34786/TPAC2009/
[13] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/status.html#hot
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Mar/0051.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Mar/0056.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/227
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/02/metadata-survey.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0221.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/227
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0295.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0270.html
[22]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Feb/0753.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0279.html
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/24
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/12-agenda.html
[26] http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-abarth-mime-sniff/
[27] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/41
[29] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/108
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0147.html
[31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/183
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/229
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
Noah Mendelsohn for TAG
$Revision: 1.16 $ of $Date: 2009/03/11 18:10:29 $
[35]Valid XHTML 1.1
[35] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:15:16 UTC