- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:15:07 +0100
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Steven Pemberton wrote: >> Yes. Using a safe-CURIE wouldn't have prevented that, but at least it >> wouldn't break URIs in rel values. > > Wait, you can't use URIs as rel values, because "next" is just as valid > a URI as "http://www.w3.org/foo". You would have to have a 'safe uri' > format such as "<next>" and "<http://www.w3.org/foo>" to make it > possible to interpret a rel directly as a URI. The string "next" is a URI reference (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.4.1>), not a URI (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.3>). Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 16:15:54 UTC