On Mar 5, 2009, at 03:03, Ben Adida wrote: > I've delved into multiple specs, given technical > examples, and even written code to prove that Henri's assumptions were > incorrect. The code you have shown[1] uses a namespace-unaware API (DOM Level 1). Using a namespace-unaware API isn't a suitable way to show the absence of issues with namespace-aware APIs. > I've spent an untold number of hours debating this issue when Henri > isn't even interested in *using* RDFa. I am, however, interested in the requirements posed on text/html parsers and I'm interested in the impact RDFa support would have on validators. > Personal taste is, in particular, *not* a good reason to change > anything. I continue to disapprove of downplaying technical issues by portraying them as personal taste. [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/ -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 07:35:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:28 UTC