- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:31:26 -0400
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Larry Masinter wrote: > I think the F2F agenda is pretty full, and that the document > produced: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/ > > is an early draft. While there may well be architectural issues > that the TAG could discuss, I think they will be difficult to uncover > without more preparation, and suggest postponing TAG discussion > on the topic. The widget URI scheme draft is not scheduled for separate discussion, but it is listed as optional reading in preparation for the discussion [1] of naming. If TAG members refer to it in discussion, then it will come up, otherwise not. We don't at the F2F have a specific goal of responding to the widget: proposal. Actually, for the record, your email appears to refer to the editors' draft, while the agenda refers to the dated published copy that's current as of now. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/06/23-agenda#naming -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org 06/20/2009 08:01 PM To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> cc: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: prefer to defer "widget:" discussion The Widget URI scheme was also discussed on a mailing list actually set up for the purpose http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pkg-uri-scheme/ And in reply to a comment I made, Robin produced: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pkg-uri-scheme/2009Jun/0000.html I think the F2F agenda is pretty full, and that the document produced: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/ is an early draft. While there may well be architectural issues that the TAG could discuss, I think they will be difficult to uncover without more preparation, and suggest postponing TAG discussion on the topic. Larry
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 15:32:19 UTC