- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- CC: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Jul 8, 2009, at 3:18 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Understood. How do others feel about HTTP's use of the term "resource >> owner"? > > Just change it to "URI owner". No big deal, Sounds good to me. I just checked, the term "owner" is only used in Part 2; once for the description of the 303, twice for 410 Gone (where it is talking about the server's owner). Unless somebody objects soonish, I'll make that change. BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 17:09:32 UTC