- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:06:37 -0800
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "'Mark Baker'" <mark@coactus.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Yikes! http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395 should have obsoleted and replaced BCP 35 http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp35 instead of being accepted as a new BCP 115. I don't know why I didn't notice this! I'll see if I can get this fixed. It was clearly a mistake. RFC 3986 does *not* contain an explicit reference to 2717, it intentionally references BCP 35 just to allow the process to be updated, as it was. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Saturday, 17 January 2009 16:07:16 UTC