- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:29:21 -0400
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
Le 4 août 2009 à 06:24, Tim Berners-Lee a écrit : >>> Basically we are adding a layer of meaning by fragmenting a >>> generic meaning: >>> From "Resource" to "Document, Thing and Service". It seems like >>> going from >>> abstract to more defined material things. This might help >>> momentarily but >>> will just push the limit to the next iteration of "abuse", the >>> next layer of >>> fragmentation. >> > > This isn't fragmentation. Hmm nothing negative in my word fragmentation. I meant Resource being specialized in terms of the context. > I am only talking about "Resource", not about other terms, > and the problem is simply that it has been used differently in > different specs and sometimes ambiguously. As in different meanings? or a generic meaning covering everything aka a Resource can be a Thing, a Resource can be a Document, a Resource can be a Service. (which is what I meant) > >> We call this "categorization". It doesn't fragment, it organizes. what I meant. >> With the organization come benefits: predictability, auditability, >> understandability. as long as we share the same understanding for the organization, yes.
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 19:30:55 UTC