- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:52:44 +0200
- To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, www-tag@w3.org
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:36:45 +0200, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: >> If HTML5 later on decides to allow URIs in link/@rel (and I think I've >> seen several >> proposals that go into that direction), then we have another conflict >> between the RFDa community and the WHATWG crowd. > > HTML5, as currently drafted, already allows URIs in link/@rel to the > same extent @xmlns takes a URI. That is, using a URI as a rel token is > allowed (if the extension designer registers it on the wiki), but the > token is compared as a string--not as a URI. Also, note that such tokens (e.g. stylesheet) are compared in an ASCII case-insensitive manner. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 08:53:38 UTC