- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:33:00 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Not sure who to tell about this now, but it does seem to bear on our
discussion of CURIE/URI confusion.
Quoth http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#relValues :
@rel a whitespace separated list of CURIEs, used for expressing
relationships between two resources ('predicates' in RDF terminology);
Quoth http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-
header-02.txt :
Link = "Link" ":" #("<" URI-Reference ">" *( ";" link-param ) )
link-param = ( ( "rel" "=" relationship ) | ...
relationship = URI-Reference | ...
I was under the impression that the founding fathers meant for Link:
and <link> to be compatible. We seem to have lost that possibility
now, due to lack of coordination between groups working independently
on extensions to HTTP and XHTML.
Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 14:33:36 UTC