W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2008

RE: [XRI] XRI-as-Relative-URI proposal

From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:10:11 +0000
To: Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@cordance.net>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
CC: 'Peter Davis' <peter.davis@neustar.biz>, "jbradley@mac.com" <jbradley@mac.com>
Message-ID: <233101CD2D78D64E8C6691E90030E5C81B6DB82D3B@GVW1120EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Hello Drummond,

Thank you to you and the TC for surfacing your work here for discussion. I know that many of the TAG are currently participating in the W3Cs Techncial Plenary and all groups meetings in France this week and next our meeting is scheduled for 6th Nov - so we may be a little slow in responding as a group. However, I am hopeful that your proposal will receive review, comment and discssion here from TAG particpants and others.

Thanks again,

Best regards

Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Drummond Reed
> Sent: 23 October 2008 08:05
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Cc: 'Peter Davis'; jbradley@mac.com
> Subject: [XRI] XRI-as-Relative-URI proposal
> First, the XRI TC would like to thank the TAG and other members of this list
> for the extensive feedback they have provided on XRI 2.0 since early July.
> Proof that it has been productive has been the emergence of a new proposal
> for how XRIs can better fit with AWWW architecture. This proposal has
> received extensive discussion within the XRI TC and on the XRI TC mailing
> list over the last month, and has had an initial preview with the TAG. They
> found the proposal encouraging and suggested public discussion on this list
> as a next step.
> The proposal is written up on an XRI TC wiki page at:
>         http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri
> I won't even attempt a one-sentence summary here as it would only duplicate
> the summary there, and the page already serves as a mini-FAQ for most of the
> questions it has generated.
> To those who have contributed to the XRI discussions here, and to anyone
> else interested in the topic of abstract identifiers (in AWWW lingo,
> identifiers of non-information resources that do not have direct
> representations, only descriptions), we are very interested in your feedback
> about this proposal.
> I'm sure other XRI TC members will chime in with their perspectives and
> questions too (you'd need a team of a thousand wild horses to
> stop them ;-)
> Thanks in advance,
> =Drummond
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 09:13:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:25 UTC