Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? from Steven Pemberton on 2008-10-03 (www-tag@w3.org from October 2008)

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:14:52 +0200
To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>
Message-ID: <op.uigci2iusmjzpq@acer3010>

> Re: pto:
>
> I always quite liked tdb: and duri: scheme that Larry Massinter drafted  
> [1]
>
> Certainly in concept 'Thing-described-By' and 'Primary-Topic-Of' may be  
> similar, the tdb: scheme also provides an anchor in time aswell (the  
> latent access may become problematic).

I like Larry's scheme as well, but the time bit is either too little or  
too much, because once you start allowing for the primary topic of a  
resource changing over time, well, then why not foaf:name of a person, or  
w3c:isEditorOf a spec, or any property really.

Steven

Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 14:19:52 UTC