- From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:20:28 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
- CC: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Hello Dan, Granted that this is not a content-negotiation case, but I think that sectiion 3.2.2 of Webarch [1] may be relevant here, particularly the 3rd situation described therein. The XHTML+RDFa representation returned here does not *define* a target for the #concept fragment identifier - were the an id="concept" on the div there would be an inconsistency. The representation conveys assertions *about* http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept, wisely IMO avoiding the about="#concept" form which would take us into same document reference territory. Certainly there's a little squinting going on here - but I think that unless one is actually making assertions about 'fragments' of the document, then its ok as long as the references *do not* resolve to a hypertext anchor in the document [aside: I'd also avoid naming things with names that look like xpointer expressions too :-)]. I think that the relevant media-type registrations could (and probably should) be brought into line. Stuart -- [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#frag-coneg Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England > -----Original Message----- > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Dan Brickley > Sent: 30 September 2008 11:50 > To: RDFa; www-tag@w3.org WG > Cc: Ed Summers > Subject: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of > RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? > > > > Looks like http-range-14 still haunts us. I'm looking for some best > practice advice for using "#blahblah" URI IDs in RDFa content... > > Backstory - > > Edd Summers has put up a great site at http://lcsh.info/ > > It has one page for each concept listed in the Library of Congress > Subject Headings, eg. http://lcsh.info/sh85112589 is a URI for a > document about the LCSH heading "Religion and the Humanities". > > There is RDFa in the HTML page, as well as a complete > NTriples zip-file > download of the dataset. The RDFa uses a #concept URI to identify the > abstract concept that the document is describing with SKOS. > > <div class="concept" about="http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept" > typeof="skos:Concept"> > > The document also has an RDF/XML representation available by content > negotiation. While the triples differ a little (Ed - is this a bug?), > they all talk about the SKOS concepts via identifiers that > take the main > page's URI and append '#concept'. > > Is it TAG-acceptable to use a URI in this manner, when > http://lcsh.info/sh85112589 is the URI for a document > available in RDFa > XHTML rather than RDF/XML? What does > "http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept" name? How do we 'follow > our nose' > here? Should the media type definition for RDFa allow the > assignation of > URIs to things other than chunks of markup? > > Does anyone have a suggestion for how if at all this should be done > differently? My sense is that the HTML spec as-is doesn't > license us to > assign URIs in this way. And since #foo is to be interpreted w.r.t. to > the (set of?) media types we get back as HTTP representations, there > seems to be a tension here between using conneg and using rdfa and > avoiding having to do http 303 redirects... > > cheers, > > Dan > > > > curl -s http://lcsh.info/sh85112589 | rapper -i rdfa - file: > > rapper: Parsing file <stdin> with parser rdfa and base URI file: > rapper: Serializing with serializer ntriples and base URI file: > > <file:> <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#alternate> > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589.rdf> . > <file:> <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#alternate> > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589.n3> . > <file:> <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#alternate> > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589.json> . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept> . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> "Religion and the > humanities" . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel> "Humanities > and religion" . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://purl.org/dc/terms/created> > "1986-02-11" . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://purl.org/dc/terms/modified> "1986-02-11T00:00:00" . > rapper: Parsing returned 8 triples > > > curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" -s http://lcsh.info/sh85112589 | > rapper -i rdfxml - file: > > rapper: Parsing file <stdin> with parser rdfxml and base URI file: > rapper: Serializing with serializer ntriples and base URI file: > > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel> "Humanities and > religion"@en . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept> . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://purl.org/dc/terms/created> > "1986-02-11"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date> . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> "Religion and the > humanities"@en . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#broader> > <http://lcsh.info/sh85062913#concept> . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://purl.org/dc/terms/modified> > "1986-02-11T00:00:00"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime> . > <http://lcsh.info/sh85112589#concept> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#inScheme> <http://lcsh.info/> . > rapper: Parsing returned 7 triples > > > >
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 09:23:29 UTC