- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 12:38:38 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > > It has come to my attention that the TAG prefers explicit requests for > review rather than considering itself invited along with everyone else > when a public draft is written, Well, we're happy to look at specific architectural issues in any work-in-progress in and around W3C, but otherwise, we don't expect anything beyond being invited along with everyone else. And we don't typically review specs -- especially specs as large as the HTML 5 draft -- unless we're aware of architectural issues. Anyone who sees any specific architectural issues in the HTML 5 spec will please let us know. > so: > > The TAG is hereby invited to review the HTML5 specification. > > A multipage version of the draft is available here: > > http://whatwg.org/html5 > > The draft has annotations indicating how stable each section is; some > sections are widely implemented, others are in their very first draft > form and haven't really received any review yet. > > For those who prefer the blue colour scheme to the green colour scheme, > a W3C-branded version of the draft's text is available here: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/ > > Please send feedback to public-html-comments@w3.org. All input is welcome. > > Cheers, -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 11:39:13 UTC