- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:23:32 -0500
- To: David Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 18:59 -0700, David Orchard wrote: > It's at > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-compatibility-strategies-20080513.html > > and the latest is at > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-compatibility-strategies [...] > This completes my action to revise the material by EOD tuesday so that > Dan, Raman, Noah and Norm can do their reviews in time for the f2f. Right; I'm on the hook for section 3 and 5 (ACTION-107). Section 3 basically says we don't have much to say about incompatible versioning. I'm inclined to agree. editorial: "sometimes a language may not want to allow it" is anthropomorphism. perhaps "some situations do not call for it" or refer to the language designers or the community around a language. I had to read the security example a couple times before I got the logic of it, but I can't think of a way to re-word it to be more clear. More on section 5 separately... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 18:23:20 UTC