Re: Review of versioning strategies (ACTION-110)

Noah, thank your for review.  I've done almost all the changes or they were
overtaken by events.  The one thing that I disagree with you on is that XML
1.0 4th edition does say that anything other than 1.0 version is an error.
It says
  [22]    prolog    ::=    XMLDecl<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-XMLDecl>?
Misc <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Misc>*
(doctypedecl<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-doctypedecl>
Misc <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Misc>*)? [23]    XMLDecl    ::=
   '<?xml'
VersionInfo <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-VersionInfo>
EncodingDecl<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-EncodingDecl>?
SDDecl <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-SDDecl>?
S<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-S>?
'?>' [24]    VersionInfo    ::=    S
<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-S>'version'
Eq <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Eq> ("'"
VersionNum<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-VersionNum>"'" | '"'
VersionNum <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-VersionNum> '"') [25]    Eq
   ::=    S <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-S>? '='
S<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-S>
? [26]    VersionNum    ::=    '1.0'

I'll be posting a new version of the document shortly.

Thanks again,
Dave


On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:56 PM, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>  I have completed my action to review chapter 2 of Versioning Strategies
> [1], and I've also thrown in a few editorial notes on Chapter 1.  An
> annoted copy is attached as a .pdf.  Thank you.
>
> Noah
>
> [1]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-compatibility-strategies-20080328.html
>
>
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
> 04/22/2008 04:03 PM
>
>         To:     www-tag@w3.org
>         cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>         Subject:        Re: Review of versioning strategies (ACTION-110)
>
>
> / Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
> | / Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
> | | I believe this review completes my ACTION-110. (I wonder if tracker
> | | will notice.)
> |
> | Oh blast. I had the wrong URI squirreled away. Ignore that review, I'll
> | start again with the 28 Mar draft.
>
> Trying again:
>
> I believe *this* review completes my ACTION-110. Well done, Dave, I
> think the 28 March draft is much improved.
>
> See http://a.nnotate.com/php/docnotes.php?d=2008-04-22&c=X1jcEq
> or http://a.nnotate.com/docs/2008-04-22/X1jcEq/index.html
>
> Apologies (again) for using this review as an opportunity to test
> a.nnotate.com.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The common excuse of those who bring
> http://nwalsh.com/            | misfortune on others is that they
>                               | desire their good.-- Vauvenargues
>