- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:43:16 -0600
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <p0623090bc3f3470f8fcc@[10.100.0.20]>
At 1:28 PM -0500 3/4/08, Jonathan Rees wrote: >Help us out here, Pat. What's the right way? I don't know. If I did, I would be igniting a revolution in cognitive science. But this is the wrong question. Why do you want to be able to do this? What problem is it solving? What utility does it have? Apart, that is, from enabling the TAG to say that it was using the right word all along? > rdfs:comment ? Independent publications (such as ontology specs)? >Are we already doing everything we can? The SWeb seems to be ticking along without any need for a special grounding mechanism. In practice, people manage to get their referents grounded well enough in practice, without needing to be told how to do it. Any general universal guidance on how to do it right is going to be wrong. So why not just shut up about it, and leave people to ground things in the way they prefer? The actual machinery of the SWeb operates independently of this discussion. Ontologies have the same entailments whether or not the terms are grounded. Pat > >Jonathan > >On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: > >>At 6:46 PM -0500 3/3/08, John Cowan wrote: >> >>Cutting to the chase, as philosophical debates are inappropriate to >>this forum: >> >>> > RDF and OWL already have identity built into their model theories, so >>>> we don't need anything new to have that. >>> >>>They have formal identity, but not grounded identity, and it's grounding >>> >>>that we need in order to be talking about anything. >>> >> >>Indeed. Exactly. And one cannot get grounding by making purely >>formal assertions, even if they are called 'declarations' and >>you have to believe them, on pain of being very naughty. David >>wants to get grounding, but he's going about it the wrong way. >> >>Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.flickr.com/pathayes/collections
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:43:36 UTC