- From: Jochen Darley <joda@upb.de>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:45:35 +0200
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- CC: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Message-ID: <4881B7BF.6060205@upb.de>
Hello, I'm interested in reading and understanding different perspectives on Efficient XML. Especially I'm curious about the not accessible reference mentioned below: > From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:27:39 -0700 > Message-ID: <BEBB9CBE66B372469E93FFDE3EDC493EF77E7B@repbex01.amer.bea.com> > > Comments inline. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] >> Subject: Re: Review of EXI >> >> [...] Speaking as an IBMer: >> >> > - IBM's withdrawal [4] from the Working Group shows their detailed and specific disagreement with the benefits of EXI and remains unaddressed. >> >> Thank you for referencing this note; we're very glad that our >> concerns are viewed as significant for this discussion. [...] >> >> Shall we try and ask all these folks whether they're OK with at >> least IBM's note being posted in a public place? If not, I think it >> will be frustrating for your >> readers to find the link and not be able to follow it. > > Let's get the IBM note into public space. I am unable to find / read these: > [4] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2007Mar/0014.html > [5] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2007Sep/0010.html Regards, Jochen Darley
Received on Monday, 21 July 2008 08:07:41 UTC