W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2008

Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:44:19 -0500
Message-Id: <55F12AF5-6645-4FE0-8FFD-A1882F17489D@nokia.com>
Cc: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, public-appformats-request@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
To: ext Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>

Jon,

On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:33 PM, ext Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
> But I would go further and question the whole approach of listing a  
> set of domains that are allowed or denied.
Besides you raising concerns of the whitelist/blacklist mechanism in  
this thread, you also appear to posit that doing nothing would be  
better [1].

To help the WG understand the scope/context of your comments, would  
you please clarify what you mean when use "I" in your comments? Does  
it mean "citizen Jon", "IBM", "the Open Ajax Alliance (OAA)",  
something else?

If you are speaking on behalf of the OAA membership [2], are you  
speaking based on consensus of the entire org, consensus of some  OAA  
WG(s), unanimity of the entire org, etc.? Also, please send us the  
pointer to OAA's archive(s) of their related discussions.

Thanks, Art Barstow
---

[1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/ 
0072.html>
[2] <http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/Members>
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 13:45:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:55 UTC