- From: Mikael Nilsson <mikael@nilsson.name>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:35:23 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
fre 2008-02-15 klockan 17:00 -0600 skrev Dan Connolly: > > > > For some datatypes, notably QName and NOTATION, the mapping from lexical > > representations to values is context-dependent..." > > > > So, while you (or maybe I) might prefer that the design were different, I > > don't think it's fair to imply that the Recommendation is contradictory. > > It makes quite clear that context-dependent lexical mappings are allowed. > > clear as mud, to me. "a function on the > ·lexical space· onto the ·value space·" admits no context sensitivity. I fully agree with Dan here - the definition is inconsistent with the mathematical notion of function. The text would be greatly helped by making the implicit assumption of a context explicit. That's particularly true as that assumption (as Pat said) may fail in other situations, notably RDF. /Mikael > > > -- <mikael@nilsson.name> Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose >
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 08:35:27 UTC