- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:17:44 +0000
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, T.V Raman <raman@google.com>, "seb@serialseb.com" <seb@serialseb.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "kidehen@openlinksw.com" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "tthibodeau@openlinksw.com" <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated. > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:alanruttenberg@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 6:30 AM > To: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) > Cc: Richard Cyganiak; T.V Raman; seb@serialseb.com; > www-tag@w3.org; kidehen@openlinksw.com; tthibodeau@openlinksw.com > Subject: Re: Question about the On Linking Alternative > Representations TAG Finding > > > On Aug 5, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > > > Well, the HTTP spec sounds pretty clear about what > should happen, so it may be a violation of the HTTP spec to > return the wrong thing, but I don't view it as a violation of > the architecture. > > > That's an interesting response, David. So the architecture is > not reflected in the specifications? Are you saying the > specifications are wrong, or that The Architecture is > ineffable and cannot be captured by mere specifications. Yes, there are architectural principles that are not captured by other specifications. That's why the TAG wrote the AWWW document:
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 16:19:30 UTC