- From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:02:03 -0400
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, seb@serialseb.com, www-tag@w3.org, kidehen@openlinksw.com
* Karl Dubost [8/1/08 8:54 PM +0900] wrote: > Le 1 août 2008 à 01:43, Richard Cyganiak a écrit : >> >> /resource (generic information resource with HTML and JSON >> variants) >> /resource.html (a HTML specific URI) >> /resource.json (a JSON specific URI) > > > Let me create another example. > > 1. /resource > 2. /resource.html (sent as text/html) > 3. /resource.html (sent as text/plain) to view the source code > 4. /resource.txt (sent as text/plain) contain the text version > (not the source code) > > And I request with: Accept text/plain > > The case 3. is interesting when you want to show the html source > code a file without having to copy the html file twice and do > resource.html and resource.html.txt > > In the thread it has been suggested to send what was available, > the issue is which one resource.html (text/plain) or resource.txt. > I'm not sure there is an easy choice. For the json/html case it > seems easier to answer. These seem obvious to me, following along from my analysis of yesterday ... If I request with Accept: I should get ============== ============ ============ /resource text/plain 302 #4 VARY /resource.html text/plain 302 #3 VARY /resource.txt text/plain 200 OK #4 Am I missing some nuance from your example, Karl? Be seeing you, Ted -- A: Yes. http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html | Q: Are you sure? | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32 Evangelism & Support // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/ OpenLink Blogs http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/ http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 18:02:57 UTC