Re: Uniform access to descriptions

"Eric J. Bowman" wrote:
> 
> No strawmen, please.  I consider any HTTP implementation which
> deliberately disables caching, in cases where caching is clearly still
> desirable (as in your example), by going against a SHOULD in the spec,
> etc. as a fringe case.
>

Sorry, change that to, "I consider any HTTP *conneg* implementation
which..."

-Eric

Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 02:19:06 UTC