- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:16:43 -0600
- To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Cc: wangxiao@musc.edu, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Michaeljohn Clement <mj@mjclement.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
"Eric J. Bowman" wrote: > > No strawmen, please. I consider any HTTP implementation which > deliberately disables caching, in cases where caching is clearly still > desirable (as in your example), by going against a SHOULD in the spec, > etc. as a fringe case. > Sorry, change that to, "I consider any HTTP *conneg* implementation which..." -Eric
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 02:19:06 UTC