Re: Uniform access to descriptions

On Apr 13, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Michaeljohn Clement wrote:

> But you are wrong, there is no such thing as a byte-copy of an
> information resource (in the AWWW sense).  Obviously a clear
> definition of what an IR is has been hard to come by, but it is
> not something of which one can take a byte-copy.  Any such thing
> would be an awww:representation.

Like anything at all, a awww:representation is a resource. One might  
argue, to make what you say true, that an awww:representation is not  
an IR, but I think that this would be difficult to support with the  
current definitions.

-Alan

Received on Sunday, 13 April 2008 22:40:07 UTC