- From: Stuart Williams <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:09:23 +0100
- To: "wangxiao@musc.edu" <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Xiaoshu Wang wrote: > Pat Hayes wrote: > >> At 1:29 AM +0100 4/12/08, Xiaoshu Wang wrote: >> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> Question 4: Is an HTTP-URI = HTTP+URI? >>>>> >>>> I have no idea what this means. >>>> >>> What I mean is this: >>> HTTP-URI is simply an HTTP URI. >>> HTTP+URI is when the HTTP URI is bound to the HTTP transportation >>> protocol. >>> Hence, the question can be rephrased as such: >>> Is what a URI denotes the same thing as what the URI is dereferenced? >>> >> Sometimes but also sometimes not. http-range-14 says that when the >> response code is 200, the answer is yes. As I say, I don't like this >> much either; but I can't see any feasible other way to answer the >> question/ at all/ for a given URI. >> >> I take it that your answer would also be: maybe, maybe not; but that >> you would want the decision to depend not on an http code, but instead >> on some RDF assertions which would be accessible from the URI (in a >> way I confess to not following yet, but ...) Is that right? >> > Yes. That is my point. But I am not stubborn and unwilling to accept > any other model. It is because I don't see other models that can give me > a clear and objective way to answer the four questions that I asked. > > I think TAG's httpRange-14 is the following logic. > > Representation=Resource if HTTP=200. > I'll just repeat here what I have said previously to you offline... That is NOT the TAG's position. > But Conneg breaks either the "equal" sign or the if clause. > I also believe that you continue to be confused about how Conneg is intended to be used. > Xiaoshu > Stuart --
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2008 11:14:04 UTC