- From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:53:26 +0000
- To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>, "wangxiao@musc.edu" <wangxiao@musc.edu>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) > Sent: 09 April 2008 17:26 > To: wangxiao@musc.edu; Pat Hayes > Cc: Jonathan Rees; www-tag@w3.org WG; Phil Archer > Subject: RE: Uniform access to descriptions > Tempted to answer... ok... I will... Well certainly (1) but > what it is that is important is *not* to confuse a > [awww:representation of [a 'thing']] with a > [awww:representation of [a description/depiction of [a 'thing']]]. In the light of a para in Pat's most recent response: All that matters (to me, and I may not be exactly aligned with the TAG here) is the distinction between things that can send, or be, messages over wires (I don't really care about making this sub-distinction exact) and things that cannot. I would add... "Particularly in the case of things that cannot (possibly) have webarch:representations." to my response above. Stuart -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 16:57:36 UTC