- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:31:45 -0400
- To: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Apr 8, 2008, at 6:45 AM, Phil Archer wrote: > Can I ask whether those interested in this issue feel that there is > an emerging consensus? If so, would anyone care to take a stab at a > timeline for an eventual resolution? If not, might it be worth > setting up an ad hoc telecon some time so we can discuss it? > > I ask because POWDER is now working towards making a Last Call > announcement at the end of the month with a view to reaching CR > before we all disappear on summer holiday. It would clearly be > advantageous if we can have a clear idea of where the HTTP Link (or > alternative solution) is likely to be by then. > > Thanks > > Phil. Yes, I see the need for action. There appears to be consensus on Mark's RFC draft among a certain contingent, in which I would include roughly POWDER, Atom, Tabulator, and RDF (here I refer to the various mentions of Link: in various RDF specs over the past ten years). We have some thoughtful naysayers, some of whom prefer different solutions (but have not contributed use cases), while others are simply critical. The point of my exercise was to get TAG review, to increase the chances that the result was something that the TAG could be happy with (coordinates with web architecture and other specs, etc.). We are missing the document that I think the rest of the TAG would like to have, which presents use cases in a clear, organized manner. (Use cases are central because they give an objective way to evaluate alternatives.) I could try to go to the TAG meeting this week with what I have (assuming there's space on the agenda), or I could push myself to be better prepared this week (difficult given other commitments), or I could wait a week, which would not be great either. I know you did your part in providing use cases, but is there any chance you would you like to help assemble a review document that includes the other use cases? It doesn't have to be pretty. Best Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 13:57:26 UTC