- From: Sebastien Lambla <seb@serialseb.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:17:20 +0100
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
Theres a fundamental discrepancy between what some of the market out there wants and httpRange-14: I can't sell 303s and a different uri per representation, because clients want a Uri with no extension ad no redirect. The only thing i can do is use 300 when conneg is not sufficient to decide what /user is supposed to be. I especially fail to understand why a /user couldn't return an IR situated at /user.html and specified as such in the Content-Location and have the same meaning as a 303 with a Location? The rule would be that if a resource is returned with a different Content-Location, the resource in itself is a resource and the thing described in Content-Location is an IR? Or have I missed something fundamental? Sebastien Lambla
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 11:29:58 UTC