- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:09:17 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On 28 Sep 2007, at 20:24, Dan Connolly wrote: > The 303 redirect stuff is almost always more trouble than it's worth. > I can't think of any cases other than legacy when I'd recommend it. > Using doc#term is much more straightforward. I'm surprised to hear that. As I understand it, <doc#term> without 303 can't handle content negotiation. If RDF is served at <doc>, then <doc#term> identifies whatever the RDF says about it (so it could be anything). If HTML is served at <doc>, then <doc#term> clearly identifies a section of an HTML document. To me, that seems like an unacceptable ambiguity. A 303 from <doc> to <doc.rdf> and <doc.html> is needed to resolve this. So, are you saying that content negotiation is not worth the trouble, or that the ambiguity doesn't matter? Best, Richard > > I can't think of any URIs for HTML nor python. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > > >
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 19:09:47 UTC