- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:28:55 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: Technical Architecture Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>, Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@gmail.com>
>On 2007-09 -27, at 16:28, Pat Hayes wrote: > >>> >>>So, Pat, what would be a better word which we should use instead? >> >>Things? > > >I think 'thing' is my number 1 contender. It was, after all, >picked by OWL. It is natural to use in sentences. >For the lay reader it is natural, and for the technical reader if >Pat you don't object, well, it is doing well :) Right, its hard to beat 'thing'. > >By the way I am much happier with 'resource' in 'information' resource' Yes, I agree. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 16:29:08 UTC