W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Preferable alternative to 'resource'

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:28:55 -0500
Message-Id: <p06230925c322dbd67154@[10.100.0.28]>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Cc: Technical Architecture Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>, Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@gmail.com>

>On 2007-09 -27, at 16:28, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
>>>
>>>So, Pat, what would be a better word which we should use instead?
>>
>>Things?
>
>
>I think 'thing' is my number 1 contender.   It was, after all, 
>picked by OWL.   It is natural to use in sentences.
>For the lay reader it is natural, and for the technical reader if 
>Pat you don't object, well, it is doing well :)

Right, its hard to beat 'thing'.

>
>By the way  I am much happier with 'resource' in 'information' resource'

Yes, I agree.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 16:29:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:18 UTC