- From: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:20:40 +0100
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
On 28/09/2007 16:43, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > TimbL writes: >>> I wonder what the AWWW would look like with s/information resource/ > document/g; s/resource/thing/g > > I think it would be a *significant* improvement for all the reasons > mentioned and the perpetual discord about what it means to be an > 'information resource'. In addition, 'document' has excellent > synonymy with well-known machine-readable definitions (as well as > human-readable definitions). Although it would be confusing for resources that are images, executable binaries, mp3s, embedded flash video etc I guess they're all "digital things" as opposed to all other "things". Ian -- work - http://www.talis.com/platform play - http://iandavis.com/blog callto:ian_davis
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 16:21:06 UTC