- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:32:02 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, W3C-TAG <www-tag@w3.org>, semantic-web-ig list <semantic-web-ig.list@reuters.com>
Recommending that both are considered persistent is a choice to be made. For instance an alternative would be say to make one or the other permanent, but not both. Life is hard. Let's not make it harder. -Alan On Sep 27, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:43 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> There's a potential Semantic Web issue here. It's obvious that the >> permanent URI would be a reasonable subject of statement, and it the >> temporary one not, unless the RDF is meant for ephemeral use. If both >> URIs are permanent, and their meaning isn't distinguished, then both >> will be used interchangeably and we have a URI alias problem. > > Yes. This is hardly news, is it? Life is hard. > > Aliases should be avoided when it's feasible, but sometimes it's > not feasible. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > >
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 14:32:19 UTC