Re: httpRange-14 Adjunct: 302 is Valid for Non-Information Resources

On 30 Nov 2007, at 16:58, Sean B. Palmer wrote:
> We could play this game across many more emails, but my case is
> watertight.

No need to continue the discussion then, I suppose.

> P.S. Note that purl.org support 302 but not 303; and that they're a
> popular choice for publishing Semantic Web ontologies. Do you think
> they should have to support 303?

Yes, if they want to cater to the needs of SemWeb publishers who for  
some reason choose not to use hash URIs.

> What if they never do?

What if they are already working on it?

Richard



>
>
> -- 
> Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
>

Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 17:37:47 UTC