- From: Rhys Lewis <rhys@volantis.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
- To: <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <005b01c79db2$b4839410$6801a8c0@volantisuk>
Hello Dave, I'm attaching the marked up version of the office 2003 doc I created from part 1 of the versioning finding. Apologies to everyone for using a proprietary format, but I wasn't expecting to share it widely and it was very convenient for making suggestions in-line. The comments in the file are mainly editorial. Let me just summarise my overall feeling about this work here. I think it says really important things and that the results are potentially very valuable to people creating languages. I declare an interest here. I'd certainly like to see the results lead to some 'recepies' for language designers. My worry is that it doesn't look much lilke other TAG findings, which tend to be relatively small and very focussed. So while I have no doubt of the importance of the material, I'm not convinced it sits well with the TAGs normal processes and deliverables. But I am new(ish) to this, and I could easily be wrong. Best wishes Rhys _____ From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] Sent: 23 April 2007 18:21 To: Rhys Lewis Subject: RE: Feedback on Versioning How about you send to www-tag in the office 2003 format? Cheers, Dave _____ From: Rhys Lewis [mailto:rhys@volantis.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 6:17 AM To: David Orchard Subject: Feedback on Versioning Hi Dave, I mentioned on the last TAG call that I had some editorial feedback on part 1 of the versioning document. What I actually have is an MS office 2003 document with suggested changes and comments. Is that a form in which the feedback would be useful to you? If so I'll pass it right along. Cheers Rhys
Attachments
- application/msword attachment: _Editorial_Draft__Extending_and_Versioning_Languages_Part_1.doc
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:20:49 UTC