On 5/22/07, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Mark Baker writes: > > > I'm ok with the second part of that, but if a new version is > > compatible, then a new media type shouldn't be required. > > Which begs the question, what do you mean by compatible? Dave used the word first, I was just responding. But I assumed he meant that instances of the new version of the language could be at least partially understood by old software. I won't try to map that to the language of the versioning document, because I haven't yet reviewed it in detail. Mark.Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 03:41:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:15 UTC