- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:00:12 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:36 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > Tim, > > A while back, you drafted some questions and formulas > about the relationships between URIs and IRIs. > http://www.w3.org/2003/04/iri.html > > I think these have been answered in the XQuery F&O specs > and the XML Namespaces 1.1 Recommendation. briefly... in working on IRI vs URI in the GRDDL spec, it seems there's perhaps more that could be done... [[[[ I did some spelunking and found that both webarch and XML Schema predate the IRI spec, and XQuery seems to cite XML Schema for xs:anyURI. So I changed the formal occurrences to "IRI", but left many of the informal occurrences as "URI", and added a note, in the "Resource Descriptions" subsection of the intro, right after we make the point about "unambiguous URIs"... [[ Note that GRDDL follows HTML 4, RDF, and XML Schema in using Internationalized Resource Identifiers, i.e. IRIs[RFC3987]. While in informal usage, this specification uses the more familiar term URI interchangeably with the recently standardized term IRI, the formal rules use the relevant terms precisely. ]] ]]]] -- clarifying IRI vs URI [was: HP review for LC] Dan Connolly (Thursday, 1 March) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Mar/0008.html Norm also noted some XML Core work on "XML Resource Identifiers" and noted that spaces are allowed in xsd:anyURI but not in IRIs. That belongs in a test suite somewhere.... are there XQuery tests for spaces in namespace names? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 16:00:26 UTC