- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:54:45 -0700
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BEBB9CBE66B372469E93FFDE3EDC493E492F73@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
Hi Noah, Thank you for taking the time to do this. I have processed your comments. I did something to the document to address every comment, except one. I still have more work to do on the document before posting an update, then you can take a look at the update and see if what I've done is ok. Act of Consumption >>[NRM6] <file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/dorchard/Local%20Settings/Tempora ry%20Internet%20Files/OLK162/Terminology_with_Noah_Comments.htm#_msoanch or_6> Sounds too much like it relates to tuberculosis" What should I do with this? Is acking it a good enough act of consumption for you? Cheers, Dave ________________________________ From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 5:49 PM To: David Orchard Cc: www-tag@w3.org Subject: Noah's transcribed comments on May 18 Versioning Draft Dave: On today's call you strongly encouraged me to transcribe my written comments on your versioning finding in time for you to use. I managed to get started on the Terminology section. Time is limited, and the comments on the first pages are particularly dense, so it's taken me awhile to get these 4 pages entered. I'm not optimistic about finding more time this week, but I'll try. As you can see, this is somewhat time-consuming to transcribe. I think that if you get the general sense of the editorial concerns, you'll be able to read much of the rest with an eye toward similar issues. Anyway, I'll send more if I can. As I said at the F2F, I thought that some of the newer material in the other parts of the finding was in much better shape editorially (and I did a less careful review at the time, having burned a lot of energy on terminology and strategies), so there probably are fewer comments on them. I hope this is a useful start in any case. Turns out MS word does a really bizarre job of printing the comments into the PDF. Where they fit on the page, it uses the balloons. The others show at the bottom when displayed on screen, but seem lost when printed. Anyway, the attached PDF shows some comments nicely formatted in context but others its missing entirely! The HTML version is what you should read to get all the comments, since many are just not include in the PDF due to this problem with Word. Still, I'm passing on the PDF too, because for the ones it does show, it's easier to follow where they go. Sorry for this silliness, but it's late, and I don't have time to fix it. If you have Word, you can open the HTML in that and you should see them all in context. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 23:04:29 UTC