- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:46:43 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, swick <swick@w3.org>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, www-tag-request@w3.org
OK, thanks.
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
06/20/2007 04:34 PM
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>,
swick <swick@w3.org>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Subject: Re: using DTDs to ground semantics of XML/XHTML
documents? [RDFinXHTML-35]
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:42 -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> I'm feeling dense here. My understanding of the pertinent parts of the
> Web's Follow Yer Nose algorithm is: get the Content-type from HTTP;
find
> the specification for that content type; the specification will tell
you
> what semantics you can infer from the document. So, to my naive
reading,
> for RDFa to have full force in HTML, whichever content type you're using
> would have to say in it's specification: if you see RDFa in the
document,
> here's its meaning (presumably by delegating to the RDFa
specifications.)
> How do DTDs help?
Briefly, not fact-checking my claims...
The application/xhtml+xml mime type spec points to the
XHTML modularization spec, which tells how to do XHTML
extensions using DTDs.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:46:41 UTC