- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:46:43 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, swick <swick@w3.org>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, www-tag-request@w3.org
OK, thanks. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org 06/20/2007 04:34 PM To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, swick <swick@w3.org>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org> Subject: Re: using DTDs to ground semantics of XML/XHTML documents? [RDFinXHTML-35] On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:42 -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > I'm feeling dense here. My understanding of the pertinent parts of the > Web's Follow Yer Nose algorithm is: get the Content-type from HTTP; find > the specification for that content type; the specification will tell you > what semantics you can infer from the document. So, to my naive reading, > for RDFa to have full force in HTML, whichever content type you're using > would have to say in it's specification: if you see RDFa in the document, > here's its meaning (presumably by delegating to the RDFa specifications.) > How do DTDs help? Briefly, not fact-checking my claims... The application/xhtml+xml mime type spec points to the XHTML modularization spec, which tells how to do XHTML extensions using DTDs. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:46:41 UTC