- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:15:24 +0000
- To: www-tag@w3.org
I thought I used to understand httpRange-14, but I'm losing my grasp on it, almost entirely. When I had to confront the issue for EARL (before the TAG got around to it), the problem that I had was that if I had a URI such as <http://example.org/amaya>, we couldn't be sure whether the URI denoted Amaya the authoring tool/program, or some documentation about Amaya. So what we did was to put in indirection properties: * [ is :doc of <http://example.org/amaya> ] means that if that URI denotes a tool then the subject bnode is documentation about the tool; and if the URI denotes documentation about a tool then :doc merely means owl:sameAs. * [ is :tool of <http://example.org/amaya> ] means that if that URI denotes documentation about the tool then the subject bnode is the tool that the documentation is about; and if the URI denotes the tool itself then :tool merely means owl:sameAs. Now when httpRange-14 was resolved by the TAG, I thought great, that means that the problem there is resolved without the need for indirection properties. You can do an HTTP GET on http://example.org/amaya and if it returns a 200 then it must be an information resource, so it can't be a tool but it could be documentation. And if you get a 303 then... well it could be either. But then... that doesn't really resolve *anything* does it? If it returns a 200 then it could be documentation about Amaya or it could be Moby Dick, and if it returns a 303 then it could be Amaya, or documentation about Amaya, or Moby Dick, or the moon, or a unicorn, or anything. In other words, httpRange-14 doesn't help out in this case at all. As I just wrote to David Booth, I don't understand what intrinsic beneficial properties InformationResource has in the wider case either—intrinsic properties that are beneficial enough to offset make publishing stuff on the Semantic Web such a pain. I know there's a lot of noise about this right now... but perhaps there's due cause. Somebody help me out here? -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 17:15:41 UTC