RE: TAG switching to Tracker for Issues List maintenance and Action Item tracking.

Noah,

My apologies... mea culpa, I put the relevant entry one level too high
in the ExIT source file.

	<decided disposition="dropped"
xlink:href="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/01/23-tagmem-minutes#action0
4">
	   <date>2007-01-23</date>
	</decided>

In the process of fixing... I have closed ACTION-31. Hopefully it will
now cease to re-appear. 

Stuart
--

Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks
RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

> -----Original Message-----
> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: 28 August 2007 04:07
> To: Dan Connolly
> Cc: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol); www-tag
> Subject: Re: TAG switching to Tracker for Issues List 
> maintenance and Action Item tracking.
> 
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> >     5. NM (5 open actions)
> 
> Well, it wouldn't be a rework of the TAG issue system if the 
> self-reopening action:
> 
> schemeProtocols-49: Relationship of URI schemes to protocols 
> and operations accepted on 5 Dec 2005 produce a new version 
> of URI Schemes and Web Protocols . Confirmed 26 Sep
> 2006 . 
> 
> 
> didn't reappear, and indeed it has.  I'm 98% sure that we've 
> agree on more than one occasion that work on schemeProtocols 
> is on hold for the indefinite future.  Not that I don't have 
> some inclination to take a look at schemeProtocols again 
> after awhile to see if maybe we've learned enough (or I've 
> learned enough) over a couple of years to get some consensus 
> where none was achieved before, but I do think we agreed 
> awhile ago, and probably more than once to abandon this 
> action.  Thank you.
> 
> Noah
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 13:32:51 UTC