- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:16:58 +0100
- To: Rhys Lewis <rhys@volantis.com>
- CC: "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "'www-tag'" <www-tag@w3.org>, "'Jonathan Rees'" <jar@creativecommons.org>
Rhys Lewis wrote: > On the specific question of whether a jpeg is a representation of > a person, I think the consensus is no. I think the 'no' answer is not reached by consensus but by definition. Unless we think a person is an information resource, a person do not have a "representation" in the web. (That is why we need a redirect via 303/#). The description of the person has a representation, which, of course, can be a picture. So, the question itself already answer the question. Xaioshu
Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 10:18:39 UTC