- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:12:05 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-tag@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:54 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > The meaning of URIs that include #'s is no more or less dependent > on media types than other URIs. For example, I can mint > a URI right now... http://dm93.org/2006/09/not-very-helpful#sixtythree > and tell you that it refers to the integer 63. As I wrote earlier: > URI philosophers will likely wave their hands and say this > isn't a problem. Unless everyone here wants to revisit the "URI reference theory has nothing to do with practice debate", I'd strongly advise fleeing this particular rathole immediately. (Those interested in it may well want to visit the www-tag archives for endless excitement; I especially recommend 2002 to early 2003. Perhaps the xml-uri archives are an even better source, though not particularly tied to media type issues.) Simon St.Laurent URI escapee
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 21:11:22 UTC