- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:04:26 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
I took an action back in september to seek clarification about http://example.org/TicketAgent.wsdl20#wsdl.interface(TicketAgent) http://www.w3.org/2005/09/21-tagmem-minutes.html#action09 I did ask the WSDL WG in... RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Sep/0056 and the answer is that yes, http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#wsdl.interface(SparqlQuery) is a URI for the SPARQL interface defined in http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl Hmm... odd that we don't publish the .wsdl file as the namespace document; we do publish an HTML document that will help people find it. I wonder what impact, if any, this should have on the draft finding http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030 Dave, any thoughts? (or are you on holiday? I forget.) Anyway... so that's what I've done for this action. I thought I had delcared victory on this in a TAG meeting a while ago, but I can't confirm from records. Besides... it seems perhaps worth discussing. I see that we almost got to it last week (http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/05/09-agenda.html ). Vincent, please consider it for the agenda of our 16 May meeting. Hmm... it seems Dave Orchard isn't available that day. Maybe we can do something useful even if he isn't there. Let's see what email discussion, if any, we get between now and then. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:04:32 UTC